If you've been to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, whether in Orlando, Hollywood, or Osaka, chances are youвЂ™ve witnessed a wand choosing a wizard at Ollivanders wand shop. Think you can tell a CGI effect from a practical effect? Here are 15 Special Effects You Thought Were CGI But WerenвЂ™t in the Harry Potter films. Sometimes, the two types of special effects were combined in order to make them seem more realistic (as was the case with many of the creatures, like Buckbeak in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban ). That being said, with the ingenuity that the special effects teams brought to the table, itвЂ™s not always easy to tell a practical effect from a computer generated one. Each Harry Potter film cost between $100-250 million dollars to make and utilized hundreds of special effects in order to bring the magic to life. These вЂpractical effects,вЂ™ as theyвЂ™re known in the industry, were necessary in order to keep budgets down. However, even among all the CGI and compositing, there were a large number of special effects that were done the old fashioned way. With each film, the technology, creativity, and budget for effects increased, garnering multiple BAFTA and Oscar nominations - including, a BAFTA win in 2012 for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2. Over a span of ten years, the Harry Potter films revolutionized the visual effects industry, specifically in Great Britain.

Harry potter pc games creature